The Financial Times presents a pessimistic perspective on the FOMC outcome, despite equities responding positively

    by VT Markets
    /
    Mar 20, 2025

    The Financial Times reports that Trump’s tariffs are affecting the US economy negatively. The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) and Jerome Powell did not express optimism regarding economic conditions.

    Despite this, equity markets responded positively to the news. The reaction indicates a disconnect between economic policy concerns and stock market performance.

    Market Reaction And Policy Concerns

    The Financial Times reports that Trump’s tariffs are affecting the US economy negatively. The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) and Jerome Powell did not express optimism regarding economic conditions.

    Despite this, equity markets responded positively to the news. The reaction indicates a disconnect between economic policy concerns and stock market performance.

    This contrast should not be ignored. Powell’s tone suggests that policymakers see weaknesses ahead, yet market participants have pushed asset prices higher. If one side is correct, the other is mispricing risk.

    Volatility has been contained for now, but that does not mean it will stay that way. External pressures such as trade barriers often filter through supply chains slowly. Investors tend to react once earnings reports confirm damage rather than when policy shifts occur. That lag creates opportunities but also adds uncertainty.

    Rate decisions are not made in isolation. The FOMC indicated that future policy moves would depend on economic data rather than a preset course. This implies that if conditions worsen further, easing measures could follow. Powell avoided stating outright that cuts were coming, but his lack of enthusiasm left little doubt that officials are concerned.

    Markets often price in expectations before policymakers act. The rally suggests that traders believe rates will fall sooner rather than later. If that assumption proves wrong, adjustments could be sharp. Aligning positions with central bank signals rather than market sentiment tends to be the better approach when disagreement arises.

    Impact Of Trade Policy

    Trade policy remains a persistent factor. Tariffs affect pricing, corporate margins, and ultimately consumer spending. The longer tensions remain unresolved, the more pressure builds in areas not immediately visible. Companies can absorb some costs, but that has limits. If businesses pass expenses to consumers, inflation metrics will reflect it. That would complicate the FOMC’s stance and force a reassessment.

    Data releases in the coming weeks will provide more clarity. If economic figures weaken, Powell’s caution will appear warranted. If they surprise to the upside, markets may have been correct to look past central bank concerns. Either way, positioning should account for both possibilities rather than assume one outcome is guaranteed.

    Risk management matters even when conditions appear stable. Those focusing only on short-term price moves often overlook broader warning signs.

    Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

    see more

    Back To Top
    Chatbots