Ukrainian President Zelenskiy stated that his discussions with G7 leaders were productive and that Ukraine is nearing a deal with the US regarding economic cooperation. He expressed optimism about signing an agreement soon in Washington.
Zelenskiy rejected former President Trump’s claim of $500 billion restitution for US defence support, asserting he would not relinquish Ukraine’s natural resources. He emphasised he would not agree to terms that burden future generations.
Negotiations about a minerals deal are reportedly in the final stages, with Ukraine offering to return two dollars for every dollar of US aid. Additionally, sources indicate potential restrictions on Ukraine’s access to Starlink internet services related to the minerals agreement.
Zelenskiy’s comments suggest that discussions with world leaders are moving towards more structured economic arrangements. The way he described the negotiations implies that both sides are actively working on terms they find mutually beneficial. Given the pace at which these talks are progressing, an official announcement could come sooner rather than later. However, as is often the case with such agreements, unforeseen delays could arise.
Donald’s remarks about financial restitution stand in stark contrast to what Zelenskiy has outlined. The former US leader’s suggestion that Ukraine should compensate Washington for military assistance is not something Kyiv appears willing to entertain. Instead, Zelenskiy has drawn a clear line, indicating that any economic arrangement must not come at an unsustainable cost for Ukraine’s future. His response also reaffirmed that strategic assets would not be used as leverage. That stance, if maintained, sets the framework for how he intends to manage Kyiv’s external partnerships.
The mineral discussions are reaching a decisive point. From what has been revealed, the proposed structure would see Ukraine reimbursing aid at a fixed rate, which would create a framework for long-term obligations between Kyiv and Washington. This type of deal would embed Ukraine’s economic future further within existing alliances. While the mechanics of these repayments are not fully outlined, even the basic structure suggests a commitment to deeper financial entanglement between the two governments.
On a different note, reports indicate restrictions may be placed on Ukraine’s access to Starlink services. These limitations, supposedly linked to the mineral discussions, would mark a shift in how critical infrastructure is provided to Kyiv. Starlink has played an instrumental role in maintaining communications, and any change in access could have widespread effects. The extent of these reported restrictions remains to be seen, but if enforced, they could introduce new logistical considerations.
